Between Ideas and Actions, Don Quixote knows the distances

I regret to not have the names of the Authors attached to following excerpts of their works:

Good article, with the great "…we need to stop acting as if relinquishing territory is the core and perhaps sole component of our strategy to achieve peace. To do so feeds the myth that "occupation" is the crux of the conflict, rather than the Islamist/Arab refusal to accept the right of the Jewish people to a state in our land." I'd like only to add the respectful and highly rational posture of Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries on the sparking moments of the war with Hizbullah. May be not exactly towards Israel, but clearly against that proxy of Syria and Iran.

Your comment: "transfer of knowledge and technology to terrorist groups by rogue elements within the Iranian regime, which might end in a non-conventional terrorist attack" is perfectly logic. About "Israel has genuine concerns about the Tehran's weapons programs", as noticed by Chatham House, this is also right. The problem is with your assertion: "In either case Israel has to weigh the dangers and its response to them." Why that, I ask you. A dirty bomb (with Iranian radioactive material) a la September 11th, in middle of Eiffel Tower, is not an European concern? Should Israel make Western world a cleaning service? And please tell me: a service like a favor just because Israel has higher chance to disappear first from the map by Iran?